PREDICTIVE MODELING

A prediction is useful
when its evidence is clear.

Fit real regression models, compare them to a simple baseline, and keep training performance separate from held-out evaluation.

Compare candidate modelsSynthetic study
CandidateCV RMSETest RMSE
Mean baseline4.5114.338
Linear regression2.7302.597
Quadratic ridge0.7060.788
Random forest2.7982.973

36 training observations12 held out

Model selection uses training cross-validation only.
LABVECTOR / PREDICTIVE MODELING

Transparent comparisons, from input to residual

01

A baseline that matters

Start with a mean predictor. Compare linear regression, a quadratic regression candidate, and a random forest where the data and sample size support them.

02

Keep the split honest

Choose random, group-aware, or ordered validation to suit the study. Preprocessing is fitted within training partitions, and cross-validation selects models without selecting on the held-out test.

03

Read more than a score

Review RMSE, MAE, R², cross-validation error, and observed-versus-predicted values. A favorable metric on one dataset is evidence for that evaluation, not a general validation claim.

04

Keep the recipe

Store selected features, target, seed, split indices, parameters, versions, and input hash with each run. Repeat the calculation from the same recorded inputs.

Predictive capability depends on sample size, data-generating conditions, and representativeness. Out-of-domain estimates and small test sets require caution. The workspace does not call a model accurate without evaluation evidence.

START WITH A QUESTION

Your next experiment.
A better starting point.

Explore the sample study, then bring your own research.